<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pennsylvania Family Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pennfamilylaw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com</link>
	<description>A discussion of family law issues, published by Mark E. Jakubik</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Strahan Appeal Argued by KTA1969</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2008/04/09/strahan-appeal-argued/#comment-6611</link>
		<dc:creator>KTA1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pafamilylaw.wordpress.com/?p=189#comment-6611</guid>
		<description>Of course they are leaning in Genova's direction.  The guy can convince a bunch of adults that there is a Santa Claus, if he wanted to.

It still doesn't make what Strahan did, right.  He should have to pay somehow.  People are disgusting today with their morals and they just get away with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they are leaning in Genova&#8217;s direction.  The guy can convince a bunch of adults that there is a Santa Claus, if he wanted to.</p>
<p>It still doesn&#8217;t make what Strahan did, right.  He should have to pay somehow.  People are disgusting today with their morals and they just get away with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Divorce adds another wrinkle to retirement planning by Expert Retirement Planning</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/10/15/divorce-adds-another-wrinkle-to-retirement-planning/#comment-6604</link>
		<dc:creator>Expert Retirement Planning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/10/15/divorce-adds-another-wrinkle-to-retirement-planning/#comment-6604</guid>
		<description>Times and opinions have changed and staying together is not as sacred.  I'll agree it definitely messes up the retirement planning though, especially if no prenup.

http://www.expertretirementplanning.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Times and opinions have changed and staying together is not as sacred.  I&#8217;ll agree it definitely messes up the retirement planning though, especially if no prenup.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.expertretirementplanning.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.expertretirementplanning.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About You by Tim Smith</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/about-you/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/about-you/#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>Sorry, forgot to tell you, I do live in PA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, forgot to tell you, I do live in PA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About You by Tim Smith</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/about-you/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/about-you/#comment-6591</guid>
		<description>Help.I know you would be taking your own time answering these questions. Please, please help.

 I will try to be as breif as possible. I figured out that I was gay 9 years into my marriage. I told her and she kicked me out and kept everything. She got a boy friend with in a year and he moved in. We have 2 children that has not become a problem yet. We have been separated for almost 5 yrs. I pay almost $1000 in child support and over $200 in spousal. I had cancer this year and was on disability for 8 mos. I lost everything in the process. Because I am gay, she wants me to suffer and pay for her for the rest of her life. I have tried to fight the support (not child support) and everytime I do I get nailed for more. I am paying $1250 a mo. now because of arrears when I was sick. It leaves me with less than $800 to live on. I have gave up 2 meals a day to survive and no one cares. 

There must be something I can do. It has been almost 2 years since I filed for divorce. Even the judge at the support hearing we were at said that he didn’t understand why it hasn’t gone through yet and he wanted to know if he could help. 

I claimed bankruptcy right after the separation and all bills were included. She owed nothing, not even a gas bill. I can prove that. All the calculations made are from her expenses now. We didn’t own the house and paid $400 rent. After she got the house given to her from her mom, she took a loan against it and can’t even afford the yearly taxes. She has dug herself a hole expects me to cover all her new loans and bills. These have all been done way after the separation by her and her boyfriend. He has live there for 4 years and at least a year without a job on my money.

I was going to turn her in for her sewer which would cost her $15,000, but that would make her have to sell the house and I don't want that for the kids. I don't need to get charged harrassment.

I just need her scared into signing. There are no assets. 

I have no money and am about to lose my apartment. What can I do to force her into the divorce? I know that she can't get the alimony because of him living there after she signs, but she knows that to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help.I know you would be taking your own time answering these questions. Please, please help.</p>
<p> I will try to be as breif as possible. I figured out that I was gay 9 years into my marriage. I told her and she kicked me out and kept everything. She got a boy friend with in a year and he moved in. We have 2 children that has not become a problem yet. We have been separated for almost 5 yrs. I pay almost $1000 in child support and over $200 in spousal. I had cancer this year and was on disability for 8 mos. I lost everything in the process. Because I am gay, she wants me to suffer and pay for her for the rest of her life. I have tried to fight the support (not child support) and everytime I do I get nailed for more. I am paying $1250 a mo. now because of arrears when I was sick. It leaves me with less than $800 to live on. I have gave up 2 meals a day to survive and no one cares. </p>
<p>There must be something I can do. It has been almost 2 years since I filed for divorce. Even the judge at the support hearing we were at said that he didn’t understand why it hasn’t gone through yet and he wanted to know if he could help. </p>
<p>I claimed bankruptcy right after the separation and all bills were included. She owed nothing, not even a gas bill. I can prove that. All the calculations made are from her expenses now. We didn’t own the house and paid $400 rent. After she got the house given to her from her mom, she took a loan against it and can’t even afford the yearly taxes. She has dug herself a hole expects me to cover all her new loans and bills. These have all been done way after the separation by her and her boyfriend. He has live there for 4 years and at least a year without a job on my money.</p>
<p>I was going to turn her in for her sewer which would cost her $15,000, but that would make her have to sell the house and I don&#8217;t want that for the kids. I don&#8217;t need to get charged harrassment.</p>
<p>I just need her scared into signing. There are no assets. </p>
<p>I have no money and am about to lose my apartment. What can I do to force her into the divorce? I know that she can&#8217;t get the alimony because of him living there after she signs, but she knows that to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning to Ride the Marital Storm Can Lead to Calm Waters by teresa flint barber</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/11/09/learning-to-ride-the-marital-storm-can-lead-to-calm-waters/#comment-6536</link>
		<dc:creator>teresa flint barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/11/09/learning-to-ride-the-marital-storm-can-lead-to-calm-waters/#comment-6536</guid>
		<description>thank you for confirming my commitment to my new marriage. not all of us simply marry for the infatuation. we agreed before we walked down the isle that family, loyalty, commitment to both as well as security were paramount in our union. it does get hairy when the initial agreement seems to become forgotten. however, i'm trying to hang in untill i can be comfortable or decide that a mistake has been made. having an attorney attempt to talk you into staying married is nice. who wants to be alone, right? just some thoughts after reading your article. thanks
teresa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for confirming my commitment to my new marriage. not all of us simply marry for the infatuation. we agreed before we walked down the isle that family, loyalty, commitment to both as well as security were paramount in our union. it does get hairy when the initial agreement seems to become forgotten. however, i&#8217;m trying to hang in untill i can be comfortable or decide that a mistake has been made. having an attorney attempt to talk you into staying married is nice. who wants to be alone, right? just some thoughts after reading your article. thanks<br />
teresa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friends Swap DNA to Avoid Child Support by Mister-M</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/11/15/friends-swap-dna-to-avoid-child-support/#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister-M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/11/15/freinds-swap-dna-to-avoid-child-support/#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>The story is terrible.  However, I take exception to the oft-used contention that "child support is for the child, not the mother."

I won't get into a long diatribe about how unfairly and alarmingly high CS awards are nowadays or the reality that family &#38; divorce court are tilted heavily in favor of mothers.

What I will take exception to is the contention that child support is intended to cover the basic needs of the children.  It's not.  I assure you that when I was married, it didn't cost nearly as much annually as my child support payments would suggest for "the basic needs of the children."

The reality is that it is a redistribution of wealth from the higher earning individual to the lower earning individual.   Typically, only a fraction of what is often awarded in CS is necessary to cover the basic needs of the children.

Don't believe me?  Why is it that the average "costs for the basic needs" of a foster child average about $7,000 annual across the United States, but CS awards for many middle and upper income families for a single child can be quite substantially higher than that?

Two different rules for the same situations.  The rules are in place to benefit the states who are obscenely incentivized financially to impose and keep CS judgements as high as possible... usually to the detriment of a father who likely barely has any meaningful time with the children as it is.

Even in 50/50 situation, I still pay child support to the ex-wife... who makes well in excess of the average income in the state/country and could easily handle the basic needs of the children on her own income if I didn't exist (and trust me, she tried to make sure I didn't exist in the children's lives).  However, I make a bit more and the rules says that "the child is entitled" to the same standard of income as if the parents were still together.

Well, when the parents were still together, there weren't two homes, two sets of utilities, two sets of insurances... etc.

It's primarily income redistribution of which, the actual needs of the children happen to be a part of.

Reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story is terrible.  However, I take exception to the oft-used contention that &#8220;child support is for the child, not the mother.&#8221;</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t get into a long diatribe about how unfairly and alarmingly high CS awards are nowadays or the reality that family &amp; divorce court are tilted heavily in favor of mothers.</p>
<p>What I will take exception to is the contention that child support is intended to cover the basic needs of the children.  It&#8217;s not.  I assure you that when I was married, it didn&#8217;t cost nearly as much annually as my child support payments would suggest for &#8220;the basic needs of the children.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reality is that it is a redistribution of wealth from the higher earning individual to the lower earning individual.   Typically, only a fraction of what is often awarded in CS is necessary to cover the basic needs of the children.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me?  Why is it that the average &#8220;costs for the basic needs&#8221; of a foster child average about $7,000 annual across the United States, but CS awards for many middle and upper income families for a single child can be quite substantially higher than that?</p>
<p>Two different rules for the same situations.  The rules are in place to benefit the states who are obscenely incentivized financially to impose and keep CS judgements as high as possible&#8230; usually to the detriment of a father who likely barely has any meaningful time with the children as it is.</p>
<p>Even in 50/50 situation, I still pay child support to the ex-wife&#8230; who makes well in excess of the average income in the state/country and could easily handle the basic needs of the children on her own income if I didn&#8217;t exist (and trust me, she tried to make sure I didn&#8217;t exist in the children&#8217;s lives).  However, I make a bit more and the rules says that &#8220;the child is entitled&#8221; to the same standard of income as if the parents were still together.</p>
<p>Well, when the parents were still together, there weren&#8217;t two homes, two sets of utilities, two sets of insurances&#8230; etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s primarily income redistribution of which, the actual needs of the children happen to be a part of.</p>
<p>Reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Get a Divorce Billboard&#8221; Taken Down by Don Wilson</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/05/10/get-a-divorce-billboard-taken-down/#comment-6515</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/05/10/get-a-divorce-billboard-taken-down/#comment-6515</guid>
		<description>Personally I don't care if she has a permit or not, my children read billboard ads as we drive down the express way. 1 child of which wants to grow up and be an attorney, when are we going to put limits on what can be advirtised.  Next are we going to allow Corri to run around in her play boy bunny suit,  I know a few people who have faced this women as opposing counsel in cases and Judges also seen to be bending over for ms. fetman.  I wonder why, maybe she was doing photo shoots for more than just Playboy but also for Family law Judges who have allowed her to get a way with misconduct in court,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t care if she has a permit or not, my children read billboard ads as we drive down the express way. 1 child of which wants to grow up and be an attorney, when are we going to put limits on what can be advirtised.  Next are we going to allow Corri to run around in her play boy bunny suit,  I know a few people who have faced this women as opposing counsel in cases and Judges also seen to be bending over for ms. fetman.  I wonder why, maybe she was doing photo shoots for more than just Playboy but also for Family law Judges who have allowed her to get a way with misconduct in court,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by Cathy Cardozo</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/about/#comment-6497</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Cardozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6497</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

Do you do criminal defense?  Is that your blog too?  And I was looking for your picture but couldn't find it....I do like your blog very much, it is informative and entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>Do you do criminal defense?  Is that your blog too?  And I was looking for your picture but couldn&#8217;t find it&#8230;.I do like your blog very much, it is informative and entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on Spanking by kneesox</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/02/23/more-on-spanking/#comment-6494</link>
		<dc:creator>kneesox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/02/23/more-on-spanking/#comment-6494</guid>
		<description>Being "culturally sensitive" to physical punishment in african american families should include sensitivity to the source of this tradition: slavery.

"I'd rather my child get a beating from me than from the overseer!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being &#8220;culturally sensitive&#8221; to physical punishment in african american families should include sensitivity to the source of this tradition: slavery.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d rather my child get a beating from me than from the overseer!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy (belated) Blogiversary to Me by Dustin Jones</title>
		<link>http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/11/15/happy-belated-blogiversary-to-me/#comment-6459</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennfamilylaw.com/2007/11/15/happy-belated-blogiversary-to-me/#comment-6459</guid>
		<description>Hey just wanted to say that you post some great content on your blog, keep it the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey just wanted to say that you post some great content on your blog, keep it the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
